Lime CRM vs Salesflare (2026)
Lime CRM is a Swedish vertical platform sold with consulting, shaped in advance for utilities, property, wholesale, and membership organizations. Salesflare is a self-serve B2B CRM that fills itself from Gmail and Outlook. They are barely the same kind of purchase.
Lime CRM
Lime CRM is a Scandinavian CRM platform with industry-specific configurations for utilities, real estate, membership organizations, and B2B companies.
Salesflare
Intelligent B2B CRM for small and mid-sized sales teams that auto-fills itself from email, calendar, and LinkedIn so reps spend time selling, not logging.
TL;DR
- Lime CRM lists €55 (Start), €95 (Business), and €170 (Enterprise) per user per month, with a Customize tier quoted individually — and implementation on top, which for mid-market deployments often matches the first year of licensing.
- Salesflare lists $29 (Growth), $49 (Pro), and $99 (Enterprise) per user on annual billing, with a 30-day trial, no card required, and no onboarding fee below Enterprise.
- Lime sells a data model that already understands buildings, tenancies, or meter points. Salesflare sells a CRM that reps do not have to update.
- Salesflare rates 4.4 here; Lime 4.1. Both scores are earned in different games.
One arrives configured, the other arrives empty
Lime Technologies does not really sell software. It sells industry solutions — pre-built domain models for property management, utilities, wholesale, construction, professional services, and membership organizations — delivered with consulting, change management support, and ERP integrations. A property firm signing with Lime skips the three months a generic CRM would need to approximate buildings and tenancies as custom objects. That head start is the entire justification for the price.
Salesflare's premise is narrower and sharper: manual data entry kills CRMs. It pulls contacts, companies, meetings, email threads, and attachments out of Gmail or Outlook automatically, adds LinkedIn signals, and keeps records current without reps typing. Lead Finder sits inside the product so prospecting does not need another subscription. Relationship intelligence flags accounts where the team's connections are thinning.
If your last CRM died of neglect, Salesflare addresses that failure mode directly. If your problem is that no off-the-shelf CRM matches how your industry actually works, Salesflare cannot help you and Lime is built for exactly that.
Cost is not comparable at face value
Salesflare's rate card is complete. $29, $49, or $99 a seat annually, no contact limits, no record caps, no storage tiers, no implementation charge on Growth or Pro. Ten reps on Pro is $5,880 a year and that is the number. Monthly billing costs 25 to 34% more — $39, $64, $124 — which is a steeper penalty than most, and Enterprise carries a five-user minimum putting its floor at $495 a month.
Lime's rate card is a floor. Thirty users on Business is €34,200 a year in licensing, and then there is data migration, ERP and finance integration, configuration of the vertical model, and training. First-year totals for mid-market deployments frequently run to double the license line. The gap between Business at €95 and Enterprise at €170 is 79% per user with no published breakdown detailed enough to judge from outside, so the tier decision happens in a scoping call rather than on a website. Non-eurozone buyers also carry exchange exposure across a multi-year term, which is worth raising before signing.
The honest instruction for Lime is to demand a fixed-scope implementation quote alongside the license quote and treat the sum as the price. Anyone budgeting from €95 times headcount times twelve will be wrong by a wide margin.
What each tier actually gates
On Salesflare, the meaningful step is Growth to Pro. It buys workflows, user permissions, custom dashboards, and a lead credit allowance that goes from five a month to a hundred. Five credits is a demonstration, not a budget, so any team that prospects lands on Pro within days.
On Lime, Start at €55 is a real tier but an unusual purchase, because the reason to choose Lime is depth. If Start genuinely covers your needs, that is a signal to ask whether a self-serve CRM at a third of the price would too.
Fit questions that outrank price
Salesflare's automatic capture works with Gmail and Outlook mailboxes. Teams on other mail systems lose the feature that justifies the cost, which makes this a compatibility check before a pricing conversation. It also targets B2B sales pipelines specifically — post-sale customer success and service workflows are not its territory, and its reporting depth stops short of enterprise forecasting.
Lime's constraints are geographic and procedural. Support is strongest in Swedish and English, self-serve onboarding resources are thin, and there is no free tier or self-serve trial — every evaluation runs through Lime or a partner. In exchange you get European data residency, GDPR compliance built in, SSO, and a vendor small enough that you can reach people who can actually change things.
Who should pick what
- European B2B firms in property, utilities, wholesale, or membership → Lime, on Business, with an implementation quote in hand.
- Lean B2B sales teams of three to twenty-five whose CRM keeps going stale → Salesflare Pro.
- Companies needing tight ERP integration and a domain model out of the box → Lime.
- Solo founders and two-person consultancies → Salesflare Growth at $29; Lime has no comparable entry point.
- Buyers who want to test before talking to anyone → Salesflare, which gives you 30 days with no card.
- General B2B sales teams outside Lime's verticals → Salesflare, since Lime's premium buys industry depth you would not use.
Bottom line
These products answer different questions. Lime is worth its price when your industry has a shape that generic CRMs fight, you have budget for a project, and European data residency matters — but not one euro of that premium makes sense for a straightforward sales pipeline. Salesflare is one of the better low-maintenance CRMs for small B2B teams and costs exactly what its page says, provided your team lives in Gmail or Outlook and your needs stop at the close. Confirm the mailbox requirement on one side and the implementation scope on the other before either shortlist gets shorter.